Book me for a gig. I do a wine talk…
Here’s a link to a newspaper article about me:
God does not play dice with the universe; He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of the other players (ie: everybody), to being involved in an obscure and complex version of poker in a pitch-dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who won’t tell you the rules, and who smiles all the time. (p.12)
The world is created by God on the 21st of October.
(Therefore)…the Earth’s a Libra. (p.12)
It has been inhabited for thousands of years, with plenty of jokes about dinosaurs that very few people get, until the end of the world comes.
THIS IS THE BIG ONE CROWLEY… AND IF IT GOES WRONG, THEN THOSE INVOLVED WILL SUFFER GREATLY, EVEN YOU, CROWLEY, ESPECIALLY YOU. (p.19)
And while Heaven and Hell have plans for their big war, plans they have been working on for a while and would really like to make use of since there was all that planning and gosh what a waste if not, however for one demon, Crowley, and one angle, Aziraphale, the Earth has become somewhat of a home and while they have their duties, they’d also like to keep their life styles.
Firstly, angles simply don’t dance. (p.235)
How can this balance out, if they’re fighting the ultimate powers to prevent the inevitable subscribed and prescribed conclusion of Earth? It is done with humour and the requirements of a good book.
There’s a demon who’s, arguably, doing good and an angle who’s, arguably, doing evil, and a young boy who’s going to become the Anti-Christ whether he likes the sound of that or not.
How’s the end of the world for s stake? Not enough? What about some romances, friendships, and detailing on a really well-kept Bentley.
There’s some stuttering here. Time does skip to keep following important happenings, but then halts with sideline characters. These add some extra gags about the human condition, but the humour alone might not keep the pages turning. Overall the pace and humour match well.
They have a seriousness and change in character but also have the consistent approach to their minor concerns and flaws that make for good humour.
How do we avoid the reckoning and rapture of Armageddon? Is that important enough to keep reading?
Personally this line works: “If I was in charge, I’d try makin’ people live a lot longer, like ole Methuselah. It’d be a lot more interestin’ and they might start thinkin’ about the sort of things they’re doing to all the enviroment and ecology, because they’ll still be around in a hundred years’ time.” (p.335)
…but actually we’d never been strong friends except in as much as we were both friends of Holly Golightly. (p.10)
A writer meets a friend and it spurs memories of someone who departed their lives. That being Holly Golightly.
…as the days merged I began to feel towards her certain far-fetched resentments, as if I were being neglected by my closest friend. (p.30)
What relationship does the writer have with Holly Golightly?
…anybody with their nose pressed against a glass is liable to look stupid. (p.47)
In its course people change, relationships change, and friends stay loyal. This story is witty, concise, and holds some classic story elements.
Low class woman enjoys fine class surrounds.
Then the future of her surrounds beings to look bleak.
Enjoyable read with wit and a just enough movement on each page to keep the reader intrigued.
…towards the end of the month I found a job: what is there to add? (p.54)
The characters feel, act and react with the humdrum of reality. The fun thing it that Holly Golightly is not humdrum.
Not long after I moved with my family to a small town in New Hampshire I happened upon a path that vanished into a wood on the edge of town. (p.11)
He’s straight into the story.
Running more than 2,100 miles along America’s eastern seaboard, through the serene and beckoning Appalachian Mountains, the AT is the granddaddy of long hikes. (p.11)
And the details.
Daniel Boone, who not only wrestled bears but tried to date their sisters, described corners of the southern Appalachians as ‘so wild and horrid that it is impossible to behold them without terror’. (p.66)
With a good sense of humour. That’s how Bill Bryson often works, and he often uses the following traits.
In this story it is predominantly Katz, an friend of Bryson, who has the major change. While neither are seasoned hikers, Katz is the least equipped for the trail they embark on.
The first chapter contains a long outline of danger that befoul the travelling two, including bear attack and snake bite. They could die.
A movie was made of this book, and used the notion of a determined quest as an anchor and drive for the story. This same quest is openly absent from the book. It is readable for other reasons.
Bill Bryson’s voice is friendly and endearing to the reader, as though listening (through reading) to an entertaining friend. Not everyone may enjoy the style, though it does paint characters well.
She regarded us with the crinkled squint of someone who is either chronically confused or can’t see very well. (p.73)
Throughout the book are details of the Trail’s history, relatable and educational experiences of hiking, stories about American wildlife and fauna, and often bizarrely inept examples of American nature preservation.
Only someone bad would ring at such an hour. (p.7)
The phone in Polly’s flat is calling.
The caller did know where Polly lived. (p.9)
Polly has a stalker, named Peter.
‘I shouldn’t be hugging you, Jack.’ (p.88)
And to complicate things Polly’s former lover, Jack, has arrived at her door. There is more than one reason why Jake has visited Polly, and the exposing is done with classic story elements.
The status most prevalent is the difference between Jack, an American four-star general, and Polly, a lonely anti-war activist. Jack wears his full-dress military uniform in Polly’s messy apartment, and is hesitant to reveal why he is there.
Life and reputation, however for the lives and reputations to matter one must care about the characters.
Why is Jack in the room? He is reluctant to explain his motives for visiting Polly after many years of separation. This ploy is sued by Elton to keep the reader curious.
As the book is set mostly in Polly’s room, it could be better suited as a stage play. This is because what holds the book back are tales of the couple’s history, wedged between sections in the first part of the book. Without them a stage play would have a better pace.
There is a lot of background information, however the character of Jack does not hold particularly well. His long speeches as he and Polly argue over the role of the army don’t fit with someone in his status position and with his intention in the room.
Elton is using status imbalance, single room scene, a character’s secret, and a stalker’s pressure as hooks to make the story engrossing. What he actually wants to do is outline the role of the armed forces, keenly the type of people they need to be compared with the behaviour expected of them (which is to do murderous things and be pious). That is an interesting discussion that is shoehorned into a story, and might have been better set in a more believable premise.
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. (p.1)
I haven’t read the whole book.
Now these are the generations of Pharez: Pharez begat Hezron, and Hezron begat Ram, and Ram begat Amminadab, and Amminadab begat Nahshon, and Nahshon begat Salmon, and Salmon begat Boaz, and Boaz begat Obed, and Obed begat Jesse, and Jesse begat David. (p. 619)
I have read passages, seen the movies and listened to speeches on the topic.
When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. (p. 2012)
I can still safely identify the narrative components that help explain this literally success.
Slaves are freed, the sick are healed, water becomes wine, and when the character of Jesus appears in the second half of the book, he is immaculately conceived and born as the son of God, yet lives as a poor carpenter who is persecuted for his good deeds.
The souls of all humanity are at risk.
Some excellent prose and miraculous short stories gave enjoyment above some repetitive sections.
Interestingly the word Bible comes from Byblos, the town in Lebanon where the first library was formed, and derived from the word papyrus, for paper. The Bible was a collection of papers in Byblos – also where the word Bibliography is from.
The world is created, quite literally, in the first part of the book. In some quarters this could be seen as an information dump, though it does set up the influence God and other characters have over everything in the second half.
There is a useful list of commandments, a few sermons, and many parables that preach on best how to morally live life.
Fifty-odd years of serene and unruffled placidity had given Lord Emsworth a curiously moss-covered look. (p.9)
We are introduced to Lord Emsworth.
‘Hear you’ve lost your glasses, guv’nor.’ (p.11)
We are introduced to Freddie Threepwood, and his language.
Her eyes were large and grey, and gentle – and incidentally misleading, for gentle was hardly the adjective which anybody who knew her would have applied to Lady Constance. (p.14)
And we are introduced to Lady Constance. It is not until much later that we are introduced to the book’s lead character, Psmith.
‘The p, I should add for your guidance, is silent, as in phthisis, psychic, and ptarmigan. You follow me?’ (p.35)
It is unusual to have the lead introduced late, however this blip on the routine story sequence would be allowed by the reader for the following reasons.
There are imposters at Blandings Castle, acting as more important people than they claim as robbery is a motive for some. Will they be found out?
There are consequences to being uncovered as frauds, plus the romances and relationships of almost everyone are intertwined, whether they know this or not, and, in what will become a continual theme of Wodehouse novels, the challenge of ‘..love would come after marriage.’ (p.184) is posed at a point of antiquated English values.
Events do unfold rapidly, and while the traditional story structure is loose, the joy of the writing allows for the reader to wish to continue reading.
This is Blandings Castle, all the characters have flaws which other people either admire or fear, yet each is not convinced of their own flaws, thus they are true to themselves and are also endearing. Being human is to have flaws, and so the reader can relate to the flawed, and enjoy the results of the character’s interactions within the society they exist.
It must be highlighted that this is the first novel by Wodehouse. There is much he shows over the course of his books, including when and how to use terms such as: gosh, old thing, I say, rummy, a bit off, golly! and (from p.184) pip-pip, toodle-oo, what!, and right-ho!
All the Wodehouse books are ‘Splendid!’ said the young man, flicking a speck of dust from his coat-sleeve. ‘Splendid! Splendid!’ (p.35)
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways – with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, Wait a second. That means there’s a situation vacant. (p.13)
We are introduced to the villain Skagra and the beginning of his plan.
Whenever they met, and much more of late, Chris felt that Clare had the air of waiting for him to say something obvious and important, but for the life of him he couldn’t work out what it was. (p.19)
We are introduced to Chris and Clare, and their unresolved sexual tension (aka URST).
The Professor emerged from the kitchen, carrying two cups of tea. ‘Here you are.’ (p.25)
We are introduced to Professor Chronotis, his enthusiasm for tea, his book fill room, and his scattered memory.
It may – though it almost certainly will not – come as a surprise to discover that the police box that Chris Parsons saw in Professor Chronotis’s rooms was not a police box at all. (p.27)
We are introduced to a police box found in the Professor’s rooms.
Chris pondered a second. ‘You mean it’s a dead end?’ / ‘Well, I was trying not to put it in such a final-sounding way. Why don’t we agree to say cul-de-sac?’ (p.298)
Eventually these characters face troubles, struggles, death and travel, mostly with Romana and the Doctor. It is a Doctor Who story after all.
The bumbling Professor, with students Chris and Clare, have to face a mastermind villain and assist travelers of time and space.
The minds and lives of these people are at risk, and things only get worse from there.
Frequent drama. Each chapter ending during a chase or a challenge. the dialogue is snappy, and backstory limited as it is revealed though the book only at times when needed.
Each character has minor annoying quirks, such as the relentless up-beat nature of the Doctor, or the Professor’s focus on tea. Endearing quirks that make them relatable.
What do you do if a mind sucking orb floats at your head?
I suppose they thought I was just the build for it because I was long and skinny for my age (and still am) and in any case I didn’t mind it much, to tell you the trust, because running had always been made much of in our family, especially running away from the police. (p.7)
When the faculty teaches writing, they say to keep sentences short, to describe and not tell, and to limit the use of “I” in any piece.
If only ‘them’ and ‘us’ had the same ideas we’d get on like a house on fire… (p.7)
This award winning short-story breaks many of those writing rules, as it is a piece with a specific intention.
I laughed so much one morning I went down ten minutes in my timing… (p.13)
It shows the mindset of a life-time criminal, yet does so with classic story elements.
The criminal is a long-distance runner. He excels at the task, and wagers will be made by the governor of his detention facility on the runner’s success. The power therefore is with the runner and his ability to control the race, and the runner know this.
The governor could limit the life of the runner. The runner knows the risks and is honest in his responses to his situation. This question of honesty is interesting, as it asks what the meaning of the word “honesty” is to the law makers and law breakers.
For a short story the pressure is not continuous. This is an exercise looking at the mindset of a life-time criminal. The story is hooked on analysing a character, rather than exploring events or situation. The book is in part, while it has risks, about why the character will not change despite the belief of the government.
There is much detail in the thought and actions of the lead character so the reader feels they can see their mindset.
What is the world like for a criminal from the slums of Nottingham? What do they feel about their actions? Would they even consider themselves to be breaking any law, to be a criminal, to even live in a slum?